Intimidation, Fear and Optimism as Mumbai Residents Face the Bulldozers
Across several weeks, threatening phone calls recurred. Originally, allegedly from a former police officer and a retired army general, and then from the police themselves. Ultimately, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh states he was called to the police station and told clearly: stop speaking out or encounter real trouble.
This third-generation resident is one of many opposing a high-value project where this historic settlement – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – is scheduled to be razed and modernized by a multinational conglomerate.
"The culture of this area is like nowhere else in the world," says Shaikh. "But they want to eradicate our way of life and prevent our protests."
Contrasting Realities
The dank gullies of the slum stand in sharp opposition to the soaring skyscrapers and luxury apartments that loom over the area. Homes are built haphazardly and frequently missing basic amenities, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the environment is saturated with the overpowering odor of uncovered waste channels.
Among some individuals, the promise of a renewed Dharavi into a modern district of high-end towers, neat parks, shiny shopping centers and residences with two toilets is an aspirational dream realized.
"We don't have adequate medical facilities, proper streets or water management and there's nowhere for children to play," says a chai seller, fifty-six, who relocated from Tamil Nadu in the early eighties. "The single option is to demolish everything and build us new homes."
Local Protest
Yet certain residents, such as Shaikh, are fighting against the redevelopment.
None deny that the slum, consistently overlooked as informal housing, is in stark need financial support and improvement. Yet they are concerned that this plan – absent of resident participation – could potentially turn premium city property into a luxury development, displacing the disadvantaged, working-class residents who have resided there since the nineteenth century.
These were these excluded, migrant workers who built up the vacant wetlands into a widely studied marvel of community resilience and commercial output, whose output is valued at between one million dollars and $2m annually, making it among the globe's biggest informal economies.
Displacement Concerns
Out of about one million inhabitants living in the crowded 220-hectare zone, fewer than half will be qualified for replacement housing in the redevelopment, which is estimated to take a significant period to finish. Others will be moved to barren areas and coastal regions on the remote edges of the city, potentially divide a long-established social network. Some will not get housing at all.
People eligible to continue living in the neighborhood will be given units in high-rise buildings, a major break from the organic, communal way of residing and operating that has sustained Dharavi for generations.
Businesses from tailoring to ceramic crafts and material recovery are likely to shrink in number and be moved to a designated "commercial zone" distant from people's residences.
Survival Challenge
In the case of the leather artisan, a leather artisan and long-time of his family to live in the slum, the redevelopment presents a fundamental risk. His makeshift, three-floor facility produces apparel – formal jackets, premium outerwear, decorated jackets – sold in premium stores in upscale neighborhoods and overseas.
Relatives dwells in the accommodations underneath and his workers and tailors – workers from other states – live there, enabling him to sustain operations. Beyond Dharavi's enclave, accommodation prices are frequently 10 times costlier for minimal space.
Threats and Warning
At the official facilities in the vicinity, an illustrated mock-up of the redevelopment plan shows a very different perspective. Fashionable inhabitants gather on cycles and eco-friendly transport, buying international baked goods and pastries and socializing on a terrace outside a coffee shop and dessert parlor. This depicts a stark contrast from the inexpensive idli sambar breakfast and budget beverage that supports Dharavi's community.
"This isn't progress for residents," states Shaikh. "This constitutes a massive real estate deal that will render it impossible for our community to continue."
Furthermore, there's skepticism of the development company. Managed by a powerful tycoon – one of India's most powerful and a supporter of the government head – the business group has been subject to claims of favoritism and questionable practices, which it disputes.
While administrative bodies describes it as a partnership, the developer paid $950m for its 80% stake. Legal proceedings stating that the project was improperly granted to the business group is under review in the top court.
Ongoing Pressure
Since they began to actively protest the development, local opponents claim they have been faced ongoing efforts of harassment and intimidation – involving communications, clear intimidation and insinuations that speaking against the project was tantamount to opposing national interests – by people they allege work for the developer.
Part of the group alleged to have delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c